None of Verma Panel Recommendations Rejected: FM
Asserting that none of the Justice Verma Committee recommendations have been rejected, the government today said the ordinance on sexual violence against women was promulgated to meet the "universal demand" for a law at the earlier based on the broadest consensus available at the moment.

Finance Minister P Chidambaram said the ordinance will act as a deterrent to criminals and maintained that though all recommendations of the Verma Committee have not been incorporated in it, no suggestion of the panel has been rejected.

He said a bill on the issue would come up for discussion in Parliament and a legislation passed after reaching the "broadest possible consensus".

"The government hopes stringent provisions in the ordinance will have a deterrent effect on potential criminals till a new law is enacted by Parliament," Chidambaram told reporters here.

President Pranab Mukherjee gave his assent to the ordinance yesterday.

"The bill will reflect the broadest possible consensus on imperatives and urgent need to have an effective law to protect women and to punish the guilty," Chidambaram said.

The Finance Minister, who heads the Group of Ministers on Media, rejected the view that the government had acted in a hurry on the ordinance issue and said the measure will have a deterrence on the criminals and that there was a need for promulgating it.

"We are dealing with a grave issue. I appeal to everyone to deal with it with utmost seriousness and sensitivity. I appeal to everyone to respect the legislative process enshrined in the Constitution," Chidambaram said.

Asked about demands for amending the Juvenile Justice Act to bring down the age limit of the offender, the minister said a consensus would have to be arrived at on it and that would require a separate bill.

He said there is no consensus yet on demands for amending Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA).

"The Juvenile Justice Act is a separate law. Whether the age should be reduced, whether it should reduced for certain kinds of offences, what you call heinous offences, is a matter that has to be considered very carefully and within the permissible limits of the Constitution," Chidambaram said, adding that the government will approach Parliament on the issue, if necessary.

He said due to lack on consensus on issues of marital rape and harassment at workplace, these have not been incorporated in the ordinance.

The Minister said that since a criminal law can only be applied prospectively, the ordinance will not be applicable to the December 16 Delhi gang- rape case but its provisions on procedural law will help in "quicker completion of the trial".

He maintained that the ordinance was needed as the matter relating to crime against women could "brook no delay" and only an ordinance could establish a law immediately while passage of a Bill would take time.

The ordinance has incorporated some provisions of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 which is with the Standing Committee on Home Affairs, the minister said. The Committee's recommendations will be included in the Bill on sexual violence against women when it comes up in Parliament.

Describing the ordinance as only a "starting point", Chidambaram said all sections, including political parties, should rise above partisan interests to support the issue.

He maintained that the government has been "completely faithful" to the Verma Committee recommendations and has come up with a "satisfactory" ordinance.

The minister emphasised on the need for more fast track courts, more judges and also sensitising of the police force, especially at the level of the constabulary.
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

1/D-117
Feb 04, 2013
06:15 PM

 The government has done a good job by promulgating the Ordinance, which I have been saying for weeks. The other issues raised by some activists need not be clubbed with this law but dealt with separately in a comprehensive manner. Matrimonial rape cannot be isolated from matrimony and dealt with as any ordinary law. Already the institution of marriage is under considerable strain. It has taken more than two centuries for the advanced industriaised countries to outlaw mtrimonial rape, but there is a mushroom growth of other avenues which are not yet welcome in India-rather Asian countries.Feminism, female sexuality and industrial culture etc has created a plethora of problems for men as well as women in the advanced countries that are being examined extensively in women's studies. We certainly lack all that literature and rather not even mention the titles of some leading books. We need to remember that today's woman is a different version of the concept of naari in the indian consciousness, which considers it unimaginable that a woman also can be a rapist, as was voiced by one prominent activist on the television today.How ignorant of the reality. We are not writing fiction when we deal with subjects like feminity or female sexuality or rape by women on women (ragging in women's hostels) or even men (the brutality done to a police officer on a holi festival day by women in remote village in the countryside more than 5 decades ago) or the depiction of film actress Tuntun as the woman hunting a husband, contrasted with Sahab Bibi Aur Gulam .How about stealing someone's husband, which is becoming more common than enticing away somebody's wife? The government, therefore, must acknowledge the arrival of the modern woman, empowered and powerful enough to hit back. Giving her the privilege of the weaker sex is silly in the 21st century, with depravity and perversity becoming the norm in human relations, Running the institution of marriage should not and cannot be the sole responsibility of the male of the species. In fact, men can hardly run a household- it is all empty, hollow, vacuous without the woman, the precious half of matrimony, only if the feminists would permit it.

M.L.Gupta, New Delhi
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: