Vishwaroopam Row Settled, Some Scenes to be Edited
Ending a week-long suspense and drama, Kamal Haasan's controversial Tamil film Vishwaroopam is finally poised for release in the state with some cuts after the actor and Muslim groups opposed to it reached a settlement during the state-government brokered talks here today.

Emerging after the marathon talks lasting six hours in the presence of Home Secretary R Rajagopal at the Secretariat, Haasan said they have agreed to remove certain audio portions and hoped the government would revoke the ban imposed in the wake of protests by some Muslim outfits which considered the film offensive to their religion.

"We will immediately arrange to announce the date of release after consultations, including with technical team," the actor who produced the mega-budget Rs 100 crore film told reporters ending nearly two-month long uncertainty marked by twists and turns over its release.

Haasan said they would withdraw their petition in the Madras High Court challenging the two-week ban and expressed hope that the government would revoke its action that drew nation-wide criticism for stifling freedom of expression.

Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam representative M H Jawahirullah, MLA, said Haasan has agreed for some cuts in the film, portions of which Muslims had deemed to be offensive.

"The outcome of the meeting is fruitful," he said as the tri-partite meeting came after Chief Minister Jayalalithaa offered to facilitate it to pave the way for the release of the film though she had strongly justified the ban.

The multi-lingual film, originally slated for release on January 11, has been released and running smoothly in other states including Kerala with a 25 per cent Muslim population, and Andhra and Karnataka. Its Hindi version "Vishwaroop" hit theatres in north India yesterday which, according to Haasan, had evoked 'fantastic' response.

Haasan, who made a brief statement and refused to take questions, thanked Jayalalithaa for facilitating the solution to the issue which sparked a major controversy.

"In the talks with my Muslim brothers, I heard their grievances and explained technical problems. The censor board would be informed," he said on the mutually accepted cuts.

The talks were to be held yesterday but did not materialise as the Muslim organisations insisted on the presence of Haasan who was in Mumbai for the release of the film's Hindi version.

A spy thriller set in the US and Afghanistan with the plot centering around terror, the film hit the first roadblock after tech-savvy actor's faceoff with exhibitors over his insistence on releasing it on Direct-to-Home platform a day ahead of the theatre release, forcing him to put it off indefinitely.

Another hurdle came when Muslim outfits expressed apprehensions over the content of the film and sought a preview for them, which the actor obliged but failed to win their nod leading to the government's ban on grounds of law and order problems.

Haasan took the battle to the court challenging the ban and got a relief with a single judge allowing its release, but it was shortlived as a division bench on an appeal by the government struck it down.

The case is coming up on February 6 for hearing before the single judge to whom the division bench reverted the matter.

Anguished and hurt, a "fed up" Haasan threatened 'self-exile' to move to a 'secular place' in the country excluding Tamil Nadu, or overseas as done by late painter M F Hussain following opposition by right wing groups to his nude paintings of Hindu gods and goddesses.

As Haasan spoke of 'cultural terrorism' and poured out his heart explaining pledging of his entire property to make the film, support flowed for him from the film industry in Tamil Nadu and Bollywood as also the Centre which questioned the state government's ban after the censor board's clearance.
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

18/D-87
Feb 04, 2013
02:12 PM

i am just wonderinf, pardon my history knowledge. how and when did moghuls reach tamilnadu?

Indian, Bangalore
17/D-48
Feb 04, 2013
11:32 AM

>>The TN Muslims would have come in for similar condemnation if they had carried out any vandal or violent acts.

They didn't need to. Jaya's intelligence apparently told her there was going to be serious law and order problem with the release of the movie. Hence she banned it.

RSM, Delhi
16/D-42
Feb 04, 2013
11:11 AM

For every Controversy or Dispute.. The Muslims have the upper hand. Utmost care is taken to please them.   WHY ??

Jo Mb, kolkata
15/D-135
Feb 03, 2013
07:23 PM

 The right course for TN Islamist Oraganizations, if they felt offended , was to approach the census board, asking for a review.  If they were then not satisfied by the census board they could have gone to the court.  Instead they threatened to demonstrate and picket  outside theatres that would screen the movie. Its not even clear what exact dialogues or scenes they objected to ? Do they object that terrorist organizations like LeT or Al-Qaida, are shown to consist of muslims ?

What would the general reaction be if goons of Shivsena, threatened to demonstrate outside movie theatres in Maharashtra, for whatever offense they might take ?  Just the threat of demonstrations would cause theatre owners to fear for safety and security and lead to virtual ban on screening of the movie.  Those islamists and jihadis now speaking up for the TN islamist organizations , would be the first to criticize Shivsena.

The acts and methods of the TN islamist organizations were the same. Threats and intimidation , instead of approaching the census board or the courts.

Gurudev Shorey, Houston
14/D-91
Feb 03, 2013
01:45 PM

>> The TN Muslims would have come in for similar condemnation if they had carried out any vandal or violent acts

So going forward, all artists, writers, film makers, etc., and of course govts, should grovel before VHP, BD etc., and ban the offending work. Then there would be no reason to condemn these organizations.

Obviously, threats of violence are not adequate reasons for condemnation in the jehadi guide to contrived indignation.

Whats InAName
San Francisco, United States
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: