File-T. Narayan
Ashis Nandy Moves SC for Protection From Arrest

Eminent scholar Ashis Nandy, facing threat of being arrested for making remarks alleged to be anti-Dalit, today approached the Supreme Court for quashing of FIR against him.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir agreed to hear his plea and posted the case for tomorrow.

Seeking an urgent hearing, advocate Aman Lekhi, appearing for Nandy, pleaded the apex court to intervene in the matter as there is "serious apprehension" of him being arrested.

"The registration of the FIR is itself an abuse of law and there is imminent danger of the same being compounded as the petitioner is being denied of his fundamental rights under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution, because of the clamour for his immediate arrest from important political personalities including Mayawati and Chairman SC and ST Commission P L Punia," the petition, filed through advocate Gaurang Kanth, said.

Nandy, in a panel discussion at Jaipur Literature Festival, had allegedly said that people belonging to OBCs and SCs/STs were more corrupt.

Later, a case was registered against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Challenging the proceedings, the 76-year-old political psychologist submitted he is facing a serious threat in the surcharged environment against him.

"Because of the surcharged environment against him and the rabid statements made by important political personalities, his physical safety is itself compromised and there is imminent threat of injury to him," the petition said.

"In fact there was no mala fide intent or purpose on the part of the petitioner to make a comment in order to insult or intimidate with intent to humiliate a member of SC or ST in any place within public view," he said.

"The lodging of the said FIR against the petitioner for the alleged offence committed under SC/ST Act is against the basic principles of the fundamental rights which envisages that free speech is the foundation of a democratic society," the petition said.

Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

3/D-4
Feb 01, 2013
12:50 AM

Parts of the anti SC/ST act itself

"In fact there was no mala fide intent or purpose on the part of the petitioner to make a comment in order to insult or intimidate with intent to humiliate a member of SC or ST in any place within public view,"  

are fraudulent and provide legal cover for the violent and fanatic reaction to Mr Nandi's comments , similar to anti-blasphemy laws in Pakistan. Why does SC allow such laws ? Is the Supreme Court now itself corrupt ?

Gurudev Shorey, Houston
2/D-102
Jan 31, 2013
05:30 PM

 Weird .... I assume in legal terms this is a request for "anticipatory bail" .... how does this directly get to the SC without the standard rigmarole of lower judiciary, HC then SC. Confused .... do the SC judges have a lot of time on hand.

Arun Maheshwari, Bangalore
1/D-94
Jan 31, 2013
04:22 PM

 Maybe you have at last realised that jails are not places where you can enjoy your favourite music on your iPod or read your favourite books on your iPad. Welcome to the real world, Mr. Nandy. You have spent far too much time in those intellectual ivory towers.

D.L.Narayan, Visakhapatnam
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: