MLA's Fate Unknown As Maoists' Stand Divided
The fate of abducted BJD MLA Jhina Hikaka remained uncertain with Maoist
leaders speaking in different voices, even as Odisha government
initiated steps to withdraw cases against 13 jailed rebels to secure his
"All possible efforts are being made by Odisha government to secure the
release of the Laxmipur MLA. Legal process is also being started for
withdrawal of cases against 13 rebels," state Home Secretary U N Behera
told reporters here.
Stating that Odisha government had long back decided to facilitate
release of 25 prisoners, including eight Maoists and 17 members of
Maoist-backed Chasi Mulia Adivasi Sangha (CMAS), he said some rebels had
already been granted bail while the process was on for some others.
"There are still some others who are yet to move bail petitions in the
court though the state government is ready to facilitate their release
from jails," Behera said.
The state government also made a fresh appeal to the Maoists to release
the 37-year-old tribal legislator, abducted on March 24, as the Maoist
Andhra Odisha Border Special Zonal Committee (AOBSZC) wants a 'praja
court' to decide Hikaka's fate by April 25.
Meanwhile, sharp differences among Maoists have come to the fore with
some demanding release of all members of Maoist- backed CMAS from jails
in lieu of Hikaka's release while others want 29 rebels to be freed.
"We demand release of all members of CMAS who are in jail now. If Odisha
government is interested in freeing the MLA, it must first release all
of them," Srikakulam-Koraput Committee of the CPI (Maoist) leader Daya
said in a letter released to a section of the media.
Maintaining that the Maoists were opposed to the government's policies
and approach, the letter in Telugu said the government was "responsible"
for the delay in the release of the MLA.
On the other hand, AOBSZC spokesman Jagabandhu had in an audio message
sought release of 29 prisoners and said the fate of the MLA would be
decided at a 'praja court' by April 25.
Describing Daya's fresh letter as "confusing", official sources said
while Jagabandhu was saying something, Daya was demanding release of all
the CMAS members lodged in jails. "We are not sure who is right."
Moreover, there was no mention about 'praja court' in the letter
purportedly released by Daya, who is considered much junior to
Jagabandhu in the hierarchy of the Maoist outfit, they said.
Stating that it was difficult to ascertain whether letters and messages
issued by different Maoist leaders were genuine, the sources said
divergent views were issued by different Maoist leaders making the
Besides raising demands which are different from his senior, Daya has
also accused Odisha government of indirectly moving the Supreme Court
through a retired army officer to delay the release of rebels in
exchange of the abducted BJD MLA.
Referring to the PIL filed in the Supreme Court by a retired Major
General, Daya claimed it would delay the process of release of Hikaka.
He alleged that moving the Supreme Court was a ploy of the state government to delay the process.
Rejecting the government's offer of facilitating release of 25 people,
including eight Maoists, to ensure safe release of the MLA, the Maoist
leader said they now made it clear that the hostage would be freed only
after the state government released all the jailed CMAS members.
CMAS, a front organisation of the CPI(Maoist), is active in Naraynpatna block of Koraput district.
Daya's letter, which came after AOBSZC's message, was viewed as a sign
of differences among Maoist groups. While Srikakulam-Koraput Committee
had actually abducted the MLA, the hostage was later handed over to
AOBSZC, the sources said.
Srikakulam-Koraput Committee has been working in Naraynpatna and
Bandhugaon blocks of Koraput district while AOBSZC is the next higher
set up in the organisation of the CPI(Maoist), they said.
Follow us on Twitter
for all updates, like us on Facebook
for important and fun stuff
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
|Post a Comment
|Share your thoughts
|You are not logged in, please