Follow us:
 
Is Growing a Beard “Talibanisation” of the Country?
The All India Muslim Majlis-e Mushawarat, the umbrella body of Indian Muslim organisations, has expressed its dismay at the observation attributed to Supreme Court’s Justice Markandeya Katju while rejecting a Muslim student’s right to sport a beard, that “Talibanisation of the country cannot be permitted”.

A statement issued by the AIMMM said that "the bizarre and uncalled for opinion flies in the face of the religious, civil and human rights of every Indian citizen guaranteed by our Constitution. A Muslim’s request to be allowed to grow beard cannot be equated as “Talibanisation” of the country. Justice Katju has further opined that “tomorrow a girl student may come and say that she wants to wear a burqa, can we allow it?”"

The AIMMM termed expression of such opinion from the bench of the Supreme Court as a very serious matter and alleged that "it is a clear infringement of the religious, civil and human rights of millions Muslims and others who have kept beards and observed purdah, a tradition continuing for over a thousand years in our country, long before anyone heard of the word “Taliban” or its current connotations."

 Dr Zafarul-Islam Khan, President of the AIMMM, said that it is very unfortunate that a Supreme Court judge should nurse such biased and communal ideas and hide behind his claim that he is “a secularist to the core”.

"Our idea of secularism does not deny religious people their right to abide by their religion in a peaceful way which does not hurt anyone else in any way. Rather, true secularism means that the State will not have an official religion and that it will not interfere in the religious beliefs of its citizens," he said.

Dr Khan added that the AIMMM believes that such biased persons should not serve as judges of any court, lower or superior. Such biased minds, he said, are not fit to dispense justice and those doing so must be neutral and fair.

Dr Khan added that if Justice Katju's logic is true then all similar manifestations by believers in other religions should be banned like turban and kirpan for Sikhs, qashqa and choti for Hindus and wearing of crosses by Christians.

Is Judge Katju ready to ban such manifestations too? Dr Khan asked. He said that AIMMM is studying this matter and may decide to appeal against the said opinion expressed by an apex court judge while hearing a legal case involving religious and civil rights.
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

1/D-115
Apr 04, 2009
10:21 AM
people who say they are secular are really not, they are secular only on their lips but from heart. Why target Muslims only, why not Sikhs, If Muslim Sports beard then they have problem, but when you do the Saraswati pooja at start of every occasion. that is what 'Patriotism'. all secularist must think before they say, please allow every one to practice their religion if it is in decent way, Burkha, Cap, Turban, Cross, Tilak, will not harm any human. think positive about all religions
Mohammad, Mumbai
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: