Togadia said that if the Hindus were stopped from performing puja at Bhagyalakshmi temple abutting Charminar, Hyderabad would be turned into Ayodhya. As the Hindus from all over the country gathered in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, they would descend on Hyderabad similarly, he is reported to have threatened in front of media persons. Why is this just "provocative remarks" and not inflammatory speech?
Indian secularism at its best. If you book a case against the MIM, then you have to "balance" it with a case against the VHP or Bajrang Dal or some such outfit. If one talks about 1984, immediately 2002 will be raised. If one talks about "painted and dented", one is immediately asked about the "50 crore girl friend". If one talks about Kalmadi, Yedyurappa is immediately brought in. Looks like two wrongs make a right in Indian political ethics.