After Ram Janam Bhoomi verdict, the judges are literally becoming the arbitrators. Facts are in front of them, take the decision on merits. If the government is vindictive, let the facts prove it. But it might be because the Gujarat riot is no more about the law, it is more about the feelings.

Ghai,

>> "But Pant says it was Bhat who forced him to give false Testimony at the first instance.Any way SIT is extremely honorable group than Teesta the hate woman and your motley group of hate peddlers against Gujaraties and Hindus."

Are you okay? Have you seen your doctor lately?

. >Pant knows the truth and Bhatt knows too."  AKGhai'

One more MAN knows the ULTIMATE  TRUTH of Feb 27,2002, life and death issue of that  ONE Man. But he is the ONE MAN IN GUJARAT WHO DREADS THE MOST to tell the three words of truth or appear before Nanavati Commission to be cross-examined by the  ' LIAR BHATT.'

It was, believe it or not, the SIT itself, and the Gujarat government, which had forced Pant through threats to change his testimony.' Faruki

But Pant says it was Bhat who forced him to give false Testimony at the first instance.Any way SIT is extremely honorable group than Teesta the hate woman and your motley group of hate peddlers against Gujaraties and Hindus.

Pant knows the truth and Bhat knows too.Since Pant is the witness of Bhat .Pant has now let the cat out of Bhat's bag of lies by speaking the truth and baring his plot of deceit.

Even if now you say Pant is telling the lie still Bhat has now no witness to support his version. We know Bhat is a liar.And he has the cause to lie again as his neck is under the noose .Hence criminal Custodial killer will tell any lie to save his neck.

Since when you have started believing the Custodial killers ? OR
If Custodial killers start speaking lies against Modi then they are welcome ?? And why not after all total slander Tamasha against Modi is itself is based on deceit and lies .So you will be naturally comfortable with another liar.One more addition .

Another revelation and proof that Sanjiv Bhatt is really DAVID,the GIANT KILLER. Divine intervention did not ALLOW  the matter to be FIXED/  PLACED before JUSTCE JAIN'S BENCH (as usual). !! " TRUTH WILL ULTIMATELY TRIUMPH"

 Raghavans, nanavatis and jains are just a passing phase which will fade away like the morning mist and TRUTH AND JUSTICE WILL SHINE , not only in Gujarat but all over India.  JAI HIND.

Karavadi,

>> This Sanjeeva Bhatt has changed his stand from time to time.

That is false.

Ghai,

>>  the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat

There are at least two other witnesses saying the same thing; one an Indian BBC correspondent who had an inteview scheduled with Bhatt that evening, and another a police constable who had gone to Bhatt's house the same evening.

The truth is the exact opposite of what the government of Gujarat claims. It was, believe it or not, the SIT itself, and the Gujarat government, which had forced Pant through threats to change his testimony. Pant had earlier testified that he had driven Bhatt to the Chief Minister's residence on the evening of February 27, 2002 when Modi had asked senior administration officials not to act against people who were rioting in the wake of the Godhra train carnage that sparked communal violence in Gujarat.  All the power of the SIT and the Gujarat government was brought to bear down on poor Pant to get him to change his testimony.

Why are all the cases against the Gujarat government being given to this bench? We are getting educated in the language used in the SC by this bench and would like to remind the Hon'ble court that even they are under the law and not above it. This Bhatt has displayed utter indiscipline, arrogance, flippancy and disrespect to the competent authority, displaying conduct most unbecoming of a police officer. This kind of unbecoming conduct is likely to be imitated by many more delinquent officers if the courts show scant respect for the executive authority of the state and its chief minister. Even judges have to conduct themselves in a manner that others imitate them.

This Sanjeeva Bhatt has changed his stand from time to time. He is looking like the assisatnt to the Villan in the Hindi Films.

The Court agrees that charges are political.  So what?  Political charges are not prosecutable?  Did Mr. Modi get any benefit for charges on him are political?  Are laws  not same for all people? 

I have a very little interest in Bhatt's case, so won't bother.
But I kind of agree with what Tejas said #2.
A 600 MW solar park is big deal. Something a discovery channel should be (and might be) covering the whole installation.
And no news anywhere.
The hatred of Modi (rather frustration of being proved wrong) seems defying logic.

UPA Govt tells the court that Kerala police cannot prosecute Italian sailors.
A gift to maika I suppose.
Where is the outrage?

Facts are simple : Bhat forced one Constable to say that he dropped Bhat at CMs meet when three dozen officers say Bhat wa snot there in the meeting .

But subsequently the Constable spoke the truth that he never took Bhat to CM's meeting.

.Now the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat and says Bhat is lying.Nearly three dozens senior most officers have contradicted Bhat .All say that Bhat is lying.

Courts decide on basis of the evidence .All the evidence proves Bhat is lying and concocted the evidence after 11 years when he realized that noose was tightening in his neck for his custodial killing of a Hindu .

Now Courts are supreme and free to take the decisions. But people too are free to judge what are the facts,material & evidence of the case .

Evidence supporting Bhat's version Zero .Evidences against Bhat are dozens .

We respect the SC but also trust the evidence existing against Bhat.

not a single electronic media took a note of asia's largest solar power dedicated to nation by modi yesterday in presence of US consulate ........but teesta and bhatt are more important to themm........god save india

 let me again look at the bench, of course. aftab alam and ranajana. no wonder.

not a single electronic media took a note of asia's largest solar power dedicated to nation by modi yesterday in presence of US consulate ........but teesta and bhatt are more important to themm........god save india

 let me again look at the bench, of course. aftab alam and ranajana. no wonder.

I have a very little interest in Bhatt's case, so won't bother.
But I kind of agree with what Tejas said #2.
A 600 MW solar park is big deal. Something a discovery channel should be (and might be) covering the whole installation.
And no news anywhere.
The hatred of Modi (rather frustration of being proved wrong) seems defying logic.

UPA Govt tells the court that Kerala police cannot prosecute Italian sailors.
A gift to maika I suppose.
Where is the outrage?

Facts are simple : Bhat forced one Constable to say that he dropped Bhat at CMs meet when three dozen officers say Bhat wa snot there in the meeting .

But subsequently the Constable spoke the truth that he never took Bhat to CM's meeting.

.Now the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat and says Bhat is lying.Nearly three dozens senior most officers have contradicted Bhat .All say that Bhat is lying.

Courts decide on basis of the evidence .All the evidence proves Bhat is lying and concocted the evidence after 11 years when he realized that noose was tightening in his neck for his custodial killing of a Hindu .

Now Courts are supreme and free to take the decisions. But people too are free to judge what are the facts,material & evidence of the case .

Evidence supporting Bhat's version Zero .Evidences against Bhat are dozens .

We respect the SC but also trust the evidence existing against Bhat.

It was, believe it or not, the SIT itself, and the Gujarat government, which had forced Pant through threats to change his testimony.' Faruki

But Pant says it was Bhat who forced him to give false Testimony at the first instance.Any way SIT is extremely honorable group than Teesta the hate woman and your motley group of hate peddlers against Gujaraties and Hindus.

Pant knows the truth and Bhat knows too.Since Pant is the witness of Bhat .Pant has now let the cat out of Bhat's bag of lies by speaking the truth and baring his plot of deceit.

Even if now you say Pant is telling the lie still Bhat has now no witness to support his version. We know Bhat is a liar.And he has the cause to lie again as his neck is under the noose .Hence criminal Custodial killer will tell any lie to save his neck.

Since when you have started believing the Custodial killers ? OR
If Custodial killers start speaking lies against Modi then they are welcome ?? And why not after all total slander Tamasha against Modi is itself is based on deceit and lies .So you will be naturally comfortable with another liar.One more addition .

Another revelation and proof that Sanjiv Bhatt is really DAVID,the GIANT KILLER. Divine intervention did not ALLOW  the matter to be FIXED/  PLACED before JUSTCE JAIN'S BENCH (as usual). !! " TRUTH WILL ULTIMATELY TRIUMPH"

 Raghavans, nanavatis and jains are just a passing phase which will fade away like the morning mist and TRUTH AND JUSTICE WILL SHINE , not only in Gujarat but all over India.  JAI HIND.

This Sanjeeva Bhatt has changed his stand from time to time. He is looking like the assisatnt to the Villan in the Hindi Films.

The Court agrees that charges are political.  So what?  Political charges are not prosecutable?  Did Mr. Modi get any benefit for charges on him are political?  Are laws  not same for all people? 

Why are all the cases against the Gujarat government being given to this bench? We are getting educated in the language used in the SC by this bench and would like to remind the Hon'ble court that even they are under the law and not above it. This Bhatt has displayed utter indiscipline, arrogance, flippancy and disrespect to the competent authority, displaying conduct most unbecoming of a police officer. This kind of unbecoming conduct is likely to be imitated by many more delinquent officers if the courts show scant respect for the executive authority of the state and its chief minister. Even judges have to conduct themselves in a manner that others imitate them.

After Ram Janam Bhoomi verdict, the judges are literally becoming the arbitrators. Facts are in front of them, take the decision on merits. If the government is vindictive, let the facts prove it. But it might be because the Gujarat riot is no more about the law, it is more about the feelings.

Ghai,

>> "But Pant says it was Bhat who forced him to give false Testimony at the first instance.Any way SIT is extremely honorable group than Teesta the hate woman and your motley group of hate peddlers against Gujaraties and Hindus."

Are you okay? Have you seen your doctor lately?

. >Pant knows the truth and Bhatt knows too."  AKGhai'

One more MAN knows the ULTIMATE  TRUTH of Feb 27,2002, life and death issue of that  ONE Man. But he is the ONE MAN IN GUJARAT WHO DREADS THE MOST to tell the three words of truth or appear before Nanavati Commission to be cross-examined by the  ' LIAR BHATT.'

Karavadi,

>> This Sanjeeva Bhatt has changed his stand from time to time.

That is false.

Ghai,

>>  the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat

There are at least two other witnesses saying the same thing; one an Indian BBC correspondent who had an inteview scheduled with Bhatt that evening, and another a police constable who had gone to Bhatt's house the same evening.

The truth is the exact opposite of what the government of Gujarat claims. It was, believe it or not, the SIT itself, and the Gujarat government, which had forced Pant through threats to change his testimony. Pant had earlier testified that he had driven Bhatt to the Chief Minister's residence on the evening of February 27, 2002 when Modi had asked senior administration officials not to act against people who were rioting in the wake of the Godhra train carnage that sparked communal violence in Gujarat.  All the power of the SIT and the Gujarat government was brought to bear down on poor Pant to get him to change his testimony.

Another revelation and proof that Sanjiv Bhatt is really DAVID,the GIANT KILLER. Divine intervention did not ALLOW  the matter to be FIXED/  PLACED before JUSTCE JAIN'S BENCH (as usual). !! " TRUTH WILL ULTIMATELY TRIUMPH"

 Raghavans, nanavatis and jains are just a passing phase which will fade away like the morning mist and TRUTH AND JUSTICE WILL SHINE , not only in Gujarat but all over India.  JAI HIND.

Ghai,

>> "But Pant says it was Bhat who forced him to give false Testimony at the first instance.Any way SIT is extremely honorable group than Teesta the hate woman and your motley group of hate peddlers against Gujaraties and Hindus."

Are you okay? Have you seen your doctor lately?

The truth is the exact opposite of what the government of Gujarat claims. It was, believe it or not, the SIT itself, and the Gujarat government, which had forced Pant through threats to change his testimony. Pant had earlier testified that he had driven Bhatt to the Chief Minister's residence on the evening of February 27, 2002 when Modi had asked senior administration officials not to act against people who were rioting in the wake of the Godhra train carnage that sparked communal violence in Gujarat.  All the power of the SIT and the Gujarat government was brought to bear down on poor Pant to get him to change his testimony.

Karavadi,

>> This Sanjeeva Bhatt has changed his stand from time to time.

That is false.

Ghai,

>>  the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat

There are at least two other witnesses saying the same thing; one an Indian BBC correspondent who had an inteview scheduled with Bhatt that evening, and another a police constable who had gone to Bhatt's house the same evening.

. >Pant knows the truth and Bhatt knows too."  AKGhai'

One more MAN knows the ULTIMATE  TRUTH of Feb 27,2002, life and death issue of that  ONE Man. But he is the ONE MAN IN GUJARAT WHO DREADS THE MOST to tell the three words of truth or appear before Nanavati Commission to be cross-examined by the  ' LIAR BHATT.'

Facts are simple : Bhat forced one Constable to say that he dropped Bhat at CMs meet when three dozen officers say Bhat wa snot there in the meeting .

But subsequently the Constable spoke the truth that he never took Bhat to CM's meeting.

.Now the sole witness produced by Bhat has contradicted Bhat and says Bhat is lying.Nearly three dozens senior most officers have contradicted Bhat .All say that Bhat is lying.

Courts decide on basis of the evidence .All the evidence proves Bhat is lying and concocted the evidence after 11 years when he realized that noose was tightening in his neck for his custodial killing of a Hindu .

Now Courts are supreme and free to take the decisions. But people too are free to judge what are the facts,material & evidence of the case .

Evidence supporting Bhat's version Zero .Evidences against Bhat are dozens .

We respect the SC but also trust the evidence existing against Bhat.