Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression
Order by

1/D-79
Apr 11, 2012
05:17 PM

 mr jaitley, if you can provide solid proof and expose these morons like ts, that would be better.

Indian, Bangalore
2/D-90
Apr 11, 2012
07:03 PM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
neha, dharamshala
3/D-119
Apr 11, 2012
10:47 PM

 Mr Jaitley, why have you waited so long ? Why are you so <restrained> in your reaction? The CongreeCrooks Ltd has been using the media and the Thinly Weiled NGO Cockroaches all these years to pour Venom on Modi. Your silence has been painful because while Modi goes on toiling for us, while we enjoy the fruits of his hard work.  

VIKK PANDIT, NEW DELHI
4/D-14
Apr 12, 2012
02:42 AM

>> "We believe certain facts were concocted." - Jaitley

Facts were covered up. The SIT colluded in a massive cover-up.

Anwaar, Dallas
5/D-46
Apr 12, 2012
11:03 AM

"Facts were covered up. The SIT colluded in a massive cover-up."

People care two hoots about what you think. You have made your position clear: No verdict is acceptable to you if it does not hang Modi. We've seen how respectful you guys have been to Verdicts on Shah Bano, Babri Masjid, Afzal Guru, Godhra Train burning and many such.

You can whine and whine like stuck pigs for all you want, but courts will go by evidence, not your warped opinions!!

Kiran Bagachi, mumbai
6/D-51
Apr 12, 2012
12:15 PM

If Mr Jaitley, the renowned legal luminary-cum-politician (also a FRIEND AND RIVAL of Modi) would have given better insight to his discourse if only he had, instead of using the words " SUPREME COURT /APEX COURT" ,  specifically mentioned   THE DIVISION BENCH  HEADED BY  Hon'ble JUSTICE  JAIN while showering praises to both the court and  the SHAM INVESTIGATION TEAM OF  RKRAGHAVAN. !!!!!.

teepee, kerala
7/D-72
Apr 12, 2012
04:58 PM

Facts were covered up. The SIT colluded in a massive cover-up.' Faruki

You went to SC now once SC appointed said the truth that 58 Hindus are innocents you want all of them be declare dguilty though not guilty .

You all have no faith in SC and its nominated investigating SIT that what you are saying and confirming .
Thanks but we know since ages that you people have no faith in Indian systems .Nothing new.

a k ghai
mumbai, India
8/D-91
Apr 12, 2012
06:51 PM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
Brilliant Babloo, BablooLand
9/D-7
Apr 13, 2012
12:49 AM

Babloo,

>> What FACTS are you talking about?

As I said earlier, this SIT has no objective credibility. Its conduct during the investigation such as what witnesses to interview and which ones not to interview, pressure and threats on witnesses to change their testimony, leaking the contents of confidential interviews to Gujarat government officers and ignoring the testimony of two retired Supreme Court justices who had interviewed Haren Pandya, all lead to the conclusion that it was about as in terested in finding the truth as the O. J. Simpson jury in Los Angeles.

 

Anwaar, Dallas
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: