Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression
Order by

1/D-67
Apr 10, 2012
03:42 PM

 outlook where is the headline that says, SIT gives clean cheat to Modi?

all media must be crying now. poor fellas, their roji-roti pe laath maari SIT ne.

Indian, Bangalore
2/D-68
Apr 10, 2012
04:08 PM

Dear god! Now we will have to bear uncontrollable squeals of the seculars and the jihadis together.

RSM, Delhi
3/D-69
Apr 10, 2012
04:11 PM

Also, one cannot miss Outlook's choice for the headline.

RSM, Delhi
4/D-70
Apr 10, 2012
04:15 PM

The less said about this SIT , the better it is ?

Deepak, Delhi
5/D-71
Apr 10, 2012
04:16 PM

Fate has been extremely cruel to the secular propagandists and the jihadis. After a short lived web poll victory over Modi, they get this!!

RSM, Delhi
6/D-72
Apr 10, 2012
04:37 PM

Reacting to the SIT exonerating Modi in the Gulbarg Society massacre case, Setalvad said that it was a huge disappointment. "We were certainly expecting more from the report. The entire exercise has been carried out from 2002 and now the judiciary has failed," said Setalvad.

Mam you did just one basic mistake .You should have asked for and Central Govt would have allotted you gladly Justice Banerjee .You should not have gone to SC to appoint a SIT under Court's own supervision. This was the fatal mistake in your strategy as once you go to SC then it will give the truth and truth only .Naturally SC and its appointed SIT can't give you the biased findings which you people eanestly yearn for.

Sure Judiciary has failed to satisfy your illegal demands not maintainable in the Law.

Remember how effortlessly your Perry Mason Banerjee tore apart all smoke cum smog encircling of burning of the Bogie at Godhra by Signal Falia Muslim mob . The new Dawn appeared with a wonderful Theory that Karsevaks burnt themselves to start 2002 Riots.

" now the judiciary has failed," said Setalvad. "

Phir Insaaf nahin hua .SIT galat thi !

a k ghai, mumbai
7/D-73
Apr 10, 2012
04:49 PM

The SIT told the court of Metropolitan Magistrate MS Bhatt that no offence had been established against any of the 58 accused including Modi named by Zakia. '

Now that is the Report
.Await marsia singers' Rudali Rudan

a k ghai
mumbai, India
8/D-74
Apr 10, 2012
04:50 PM

Why is the Outlook silent on the fact that Modi has been given a clean chit by the SIT?

Alakshyendra, Hyderabad
9/D-79
Apr 10, 2012
05:13 PM

 Does Zakia Jafferey now realize how she has been taken for a ride by the sickular bigots?

The Irreverent Indian, Online
10/D-80
Apr 10, 2012
05:42 PM

 You are very biased & shameless people .Your headline should have been' NO EVIDENCE FOUND AGAINST MODI'.But headline is something else.

Journalism Ke Naam par Badnuma Daag hain Aap Log.

Paramvir Sawhney, Gurgaon
11/D-82
Apr 10, 2012
05:51 PM

OUTLOOK is embarrass to write this report which goes against their pseudo secular anti Modi bashing idea.Shame on you,the editor of OUTLOOK not to give proper HEADLINE.Looks like OUTLOOK is offended by this report.

Laxman, Lowell
12/D-83
Apr 10, 2012
05:58 PM

IF only TS had an inkling of this outcome, she would have manufactured SIT report. Now what ? Will she approach international court of justice ? UNHRC ?

K.Suresh, Bangalore
13/D-84
Apr 10, 2012
06:12 PM

Gujarat Riots: (Gujarat District and Sessions) Court Convicts 23 for Ode Massacre

Vs.

SIT Finds No Evidence Against Modi in '02 Riots

And I thought Gujarat courts were controlled by Modi, Sanghis, and Bajrangis and SIT was more "secular"??? What happened Teesta Ben???

Kiran Bagachi, mumbai
14/D-85
Apr 10, 2012
06:17 PM

The next thing we will hear is that the complainants/media anchors have no faith in the judiciary too.

Waiting to see how NDTV spins it into an anti Mody story.

Sachin, Noida
15/D-86
Apr 10, 2012
06:30 PM

Some in meda are already crying hoarse that Modi will use this report for electoral gains as if the other side would have quietly sat home meditating in case the report was against Modi.

We would have been hearing cries to hang Modi in the 9 o'clock news shows if there was even an iota gainst him in the report.Now the conclusion will be: Lets wait for the court to announce results.SIT was not important in any case.

Sachin, Noida
16/D-91
Apr 10, 2012
06:56 PM

No Offence Established Against Modi in SIT Report: Court
PTI | Ahmedabad | Apr 10, 2012
 

It is temporary relief for Modi and temporary setback for Zakia Jafri,the complainant.She could still file the protest petition before the same court,in case, there is any conflict in report of SIT and that of Amicus Curiae.This legal remedy is still open to her.But,she has to wait for a month as per court's directions.

My heart,however, goes out to Zakia Jaafri and her family for the sufferings it has undergone during the past one decade.I wish she gets justice ultimately. Insha Allah!

Any discussion of merit of court's orders at this stage would be premature and  tantamount to contempt of court until the complainant receives the documents including the SIT report and the report of SC appointed Amicus Curiae.

We have to wait for the final judgement of the competent court, whatever  be it !

A K SAXENA (A retired civil servant)

A K SAXENA, DELHI.INDIA
17/D-94
Apr 10, 2012
07:08 PM

NDTV already has started giving its spin to the whole thing. This is what it reported:

The petitioners now pin their hopes on the independent findings in the case of amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran, who has reportedly contradicted the SIT to contend that there is evidence enough to prosecute Mr Modi under some sections of the law. Ms Setalvad said she hoped that the amicus' report was part of the documents submitted by the SIT in court.

Mr Modi faces accusations of conspiracy not just from Ms Jafri, but also from two senior police officers of that time. One, Sanjiv Bhatt, has claimed before court that he was part of two crucial law and order meetings in which the Chief Minister ordered the police to go slow on rioters when communal rioting began after 59 passengers, mostly kar sevaks returning from Ayodhya, were killed in the Godhra train burning incident of February 28, 2002. A former Gujarat Director General of Police RB Sreekumar too reportedly made such a claim before an inquiry commission. Over a 1000 Muslims were killed across Gujarat in the post-Godhra communal riots.

Kiran Bagachi, mumbai
18/D-96
Apr 10, 2012
07:40 PM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
neha, dharamshala
19/D-99
Apr 10, 2012
07:45 PM

Everybody's heart should go out to Ms. Jaffrey.  After enduring unspeakable tragedy 10 years ago, hollows in her heart has been played by Teesta and company like a flute for ten years just so they keep on getting funds from Desh Ke Dushmano.  Then again, it seems Ms. Jaffrey is not giving up.  She will continue to give her mind and body to Teesta to play some more.  She is hell bent on making Teesta very rich.

P.B. Joshipura, Suffolk, Virginia
20/D-104
Apr 10, 2012
08:01 PM

 Intreresting headline by outlook. 

Maha, NJ
21/D-105
Apr 10, 2012
08:07 PM

" My faith in judiciary is now gone."

You can move to China or Pakistan where you can verdict that suits your biased mind. In India, unfortunately for you, judiciary will look at the evidence to make its decision.

Maha, NJ
22/D-106
Apr 10, 2012
08:26 PM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
VIKK PANDIT, NEW DELHI
23/D-107
Apr 10, 2012
08:31 PM

No offence established against Vinod Mehta in Gujarat riots.  Would he consider that as 'Clean Chit'?

P.B. Joshipura, Suffolk, Virginia
24/D-108
Apr 10, 2012
08:37 PM

SIT hasnt found Modi"s direct invollvment in Gulbarg Massacare,to think so was foolish.The old Widow must be disappointed on the verdict,having seen savagery before her eyes and her man bieng killed Zakia must have felt let down by Modi in not coming to the rescue of her husband.

In a situation as unprecedented as the one during post Godhra riots the police response was muted.Even if the Gujrat police are exonerated for Gulbarg,there is no way Gujrat police can claim immunity when violence continued for days and even months after Godhra and a Particular community was targetted repeatedly.

We hear that those accused of carnage are bieng brought to book,Zakia must seek solace in it.Let justice be delivered as in case of Sabarmati carnage.Sikhs are waiting as the Christians in Kandhamal as well.

Modi can claim he got justice for bieng implicated falsely ,victims of violence also have the very same right to justice

wrongone, chennai
25/D-109
Apr 10, 2012
08:43 PM

We have too many judges/eyewitness in this forum...when Modi is given clean chit "judiciary has failed" .... If any remarks are passed then the same "judiciary has passed in first class with distinction"... Poor fellow Modi he is in news for all reasons...

prasath, Pondicherry
26/D-110
Apr 10, 2012
08:44 PM

 "In the court of the Lord above....

This is becoming too much of a drama. I am beginning to completely loose my sympathy for this woman. 

To come to the point Zakia, your lord does not have jurisdiction over us. Motion denied !

Kautilya, Washington DC
27/D-111
Apr 10, 2012
08:55 PM

@ Wrong One

>> "SIT hasnt found Modi"s direct invollvment in Gulbarg Massacare....."

SIT could not find any evidence of even 'indirect' involvement. Every fable that you heard was a creation of sickular creativity.

>> "Zakia must have felt let down by Modi in not coming to the rescue of her husband." - Wrong One

Oh yes moron!! Tens of thousands were on the streets on rampage all across the state. Modi should have been running helter-skelter saving everyone's husband. But, it is heartening to see the sickular band-wagon to expect Modi to achieve what the 130-odd policemen at Gulbarga Society could not. Even his worst detractors seem to find Modi capable to extraordinary things.

But, Gujarat wasn't a superhero movie, and Modi wasn't a Superman. Too bad!!

The Irreverent Indian
Online, India
28/D-112
Apr 10, 2012
08:57 PM

>> "According to SIT, no offence has been established against any of the 58 persons listed in Zakia's complaint"

This is what happens (and should happen) when your FIRs change the names of the accused.

The Irreverent Indian, Online
29/D-113
Apr 10, 2012
08:59 PM

 when will court wake up and stop entertaining these frivolous cases against modi and stop teesta and others from wasting precious time? also they should be made to pay heavy fines.

Indian, Bangalore
30/D-115
Apr 10, 2012
09:06 PM

All jihadis went hiding in their holes?

Rajesh, Bangalore
31/D-120
Apr 10, 2012
09:35 PM

You must be one hell of a jerk, Irreverant.Dont have it in me to stoop as low as you do.U are no different to likes of Hafiz Saeed and co.They stand exposed but jerks like you vitiate all norms of decency in a debate.

The fact is these jokers seeking justice must know that you take whats given or otherwise quit.If Indian Muslims feel they have a future in India,honestly with so many like Irrevrent Indian on the streets they better stop dreaming.Start living.No place for sanity in India.

Nothing will come out of spending years probing ,isnt 84 and so many riots in the past not enough proof.

wrongone, chennai
32/D-123
Apr 10, 2012
10:14 PM

 It is nobodies case that Modi was directly involved in the sense that he personally stabbed or raped or set anyone afire. Very glad that so much of tax payers money has been used to enrich Raghavans and Nanavatis of the world. Long live legalities. In our country agriculture is in distress . Farmers are leaving villages and migrating to cities. I think they should all take to law. There will always be victims and litigations and no punishment in the lifetime of offenders. See HKL Bhagat is dead. To know that once upon a time the legal fraternity led the freedom struggle! 

Modi is as innocent as Osama bin Laden. Did any enquiry commission ever establish that Osama was pilotting any of the planes that crashed on 9/11 ? Osama got his just deserts. Modi too will. Everyone knows about the orders given to Police on the day before the massacre. If Nanavati was the judge in Nuremberg trials and Raghavan the prosecuting authority, Hitler would have got a clean chit. See what sort of people become CBI chiefs. 

May be Justice Katju will comment on the calibre of some of the judges.

Supreme Court had foreseen all this (clean chit etc). That is why they had appointed Raju Ramachandran as amicus curae and  ruled that in the event of a closure report the petitioners will have to be heard. And the petitioners have the option of going to higher courts all the way upto the Supreme court. We the people of India, salute the petitioners and others who are not just fighting for justice for the victims but also are contributing to building of strong institutions so that henceforth  their past is no one's future.

R. Saroja, Bombay
33/D-124
Apr 10, 2012
10:17 PM

Can’t wait to see (read in Ooulook) the heartburn Saba Naqvi will be having on the SIT report outcome! She will have list of problems with SIT investigation, just like she had with Allahabad HC decision on Babari Masjid case. They pick and choose the court decisions!

Pramod, Phoenix
34/D-127
Apr 10, 2012
10:47 PM

Outlook has offered a class on bias Reporting 101, judge for yourself.

Version by Times of India:
SIT gives clean chit to Modi in Gujarat riot case
"According to SIT, no offence has been established against
any of the 58 persons listed in Zakia's complaint," metropolitan magistrate
M S Bhatt said in his order on Tuesday.

Outlook Version of same news:
No Prosecutable Evidence Against Modi in SIT Report:
The Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team has
found no evidence against Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 57
others in the complaint filed against them by Zakia Jafri
in the 2002 Gujarat riots, a Magisterial court said today.

Smita, Baroda
35/D-128
Apr 10, 2012
11:00 PM

Prosecuting Modi in Gujarat would be as difficult as prosecuting Hafeez Saeed in Pakistan!

Anwaar, Dallas
36/D-129
Apr 10, 2012
11:08 PM

>> Prosecuting Modi in Gujarat would be as difficult as prosecuting Hafeez Saeed in Pakistan

 Muslims saying they love India above religion will be like saying Mohammed was real

bala, Chennai
37/D-132
Apr 10, 2012
11:29 PM

Bala,

Bringing in Mohammed or Ram in this discussion is stupid. This discussion of course has communal undertones, but it is not a religious argument.

Anwaar, Dallas
38/D-133
Apr 10, 2012
11:40 PM

Raghavan himself admits to the limited and circumscribed nature of his investigation when he said, " no evidence on the contents of the particular petition was available," suggesting that if there was evidence but it did not directly pertain to Zakia's petition, the SIT ignored it!

Anwaar, Dallas
39/D-134
Apr 10, 2012
11:49 PM

 >> Prosecuting Modi in Gujarat would be as difficult as prosecuting Hafeez Saeed in Pakistan

Is anyone trying to prosecute Saeed in Pakistan ? 

Maha
NJ, United States
40/D-135
Apr 10, 2012
11:58 PM

While we are extolling Raghavan and his SIT, let us not forget that during Raghavan's tenure as Director of the CBI (1999-2001) the CBI was under a cloud owing to its handling of the Priyadarshini Mattoo case, in which Santosh Kumar Singh, the alleged murderer of a 22-year old law student was acquitted for what the case judge called "deliberate inaction" by the investigating team. The accused was the son of a high ranking officer in the Indian Police Service, due to which the case had been shifted from the regular police force to the CBI. However, the 1999 judgment commented on how "the influence of the father of the accused has been there".

The case was again prominent in 2006 after much media coverage and public bashing. The High Court subsequently found Santosh Kumar Singh guilty of rape and murder and awarded a death sentence for the same in October 2006.

Anwaar, Dallas
41/D-1
Apr 11, 2012
12:01 AM

>> "Prosecuting Modi in Gujarat would be as difficult as prosecuting Hafeez Saeed in Pakistan!"

The Mullah apologist is losing his consistency again!! Why should Saeed be prosecuted for 'RSS ki saazish'?

The basic premise for prosecution is EVIDENCE. In case of Modi, the sickular bandwagon has been UNABLE to provide (or manufacture) anything credible. In case of the other, they have (probably) CHOSEN not to provide one. The Indian government's evidences were so lousy that even the US had to ignore it. There's a $10M bounty on Saeed's head for evidences (for 2008 mumabi attacks) that India's Home Minister could (or did not?) not provide. 

Either way, now that US has its gaze on that man, the Mullahdom must prepare for another round of prayers for him. The last one, that is.

The Irreverent Indian
Online, India
42/D-3
Apr 11, 2012
12:07 AM

Maha,

>> Is anyone trying to prosecute Saeed in Pakistan?

Pakistani court has acquitted Hafiz Saeed on many occasions and in many cases due to "lack of evidence". In 2009, the Lahore High Court quashed all cases against Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and set him free. Pakistani judges probably studied in the same school Raghavan and Nanavati went to! 

Anwaar, Dallas
43/D-4
Apr 11, 2012
12:09 AM

@ Wrong One

>> "Dont have it in me to stoop as low as you do."

You are already waist-deep in mud. If you stoop any more, it will seep into your throats. My responses to you were condescending, but apt.

>> "The fact is these jokers seeking justice must know that you take whats given or otherwise quit."

That is absolute bullshit!! They are NOT seeking justice. They are seeking a "one-man victim". The ground fact is that the careers of Teesta and the sickular brigand will end if the justice gets delivered.

The Irreverent Indian
Online, India
44/D-5
Apr 11, 2012
12:10 AM

 " Pakistani judges probably studied in the same school Raghavan and Nanavati went to! "

I did not realize the judgement was this bad for the succulars. They have become thoroughly unhinged.

Ganesan, Nj
45/D-7
Apr 11, 2012
12:21 AM

Ganesan,

>> They have become thoroughly unhinged.

Look who is talking of being unhinged!

Anwaar, Dallas
46/D-8
Apr 11, 2012
12:27 AM

" I did not realize the judgement was this bad for the succulars."

While the judgement was bad, expect the complete abuse of SIT and hair spitting in next few days. The riot cottage factory will continue to flourish unless their sponsors loose faith in them with this result.

I heard Raghvan's interview on NDTV by Burkha. He was too dignified to respond to pathetic questions by Burkha asking his opinion about Teesta's comments "She will expose SIT". 

Maha
NJ, United States
47/D-9
Apr 11, 2012
12:37 AM

Maha,

>> expect the complete abuse of SIT and hair spitting in next few days...

Expect worthless predictions and senseless interjections for the next few days.

Anwaar, Dallas
48/D-10
Apr 11, 2012
12:40 AM

 From tweets of Sanjiv Bhatt IPS :

Modi The Master Manipulator: Ode Massacre-23 Killled, SIT demands Death Penalty for 23 accused. Gulbarg Massacre-58 Killed, Closure Report.

Headline for tomorrow's newspapers: "No One Killed Ehsan Jaafri"

Someone I hold in high esteem said a very interesting thing to me:
"I've been thinking since the last ten years that a person who needs to keep being given clean chits every now and then, has to be a very dirty person."
 

R. Saroja, Bombay
49/D-11
Apr 11, 2012
12:40 AM

Irreverent,

>> The Mullah apologist ....

Idiotic vocabulary of a hatespewing moron!

Anwaar, Dallas
50/D-12
Apr 11, 2012
12:42 AM

Saroja,

>> "I've been thinking since the last ten years that a person who needs to keep being given clean chits every now and then, has to be a very dirty person."

Brilliant!

Anwaar, Dallas
51/D-13
Apr 11, 2012
12:56 AM

Anwaar:
Prosecuting Modi in Gujarat would be as difficult as prosecuting Hafeez Saeed in Pakistan!

On the contrary, every Tom, Dick and Harry is out to prosecute Mr. Modi. If my memory serves me correctly, Mr. Lallooo (I rather call him Mr. Uloo) appointed banerjee commission, then came Nanavati commission, then came Best bakery case, along with two or there SIT, countless domestic and foreign funded NGO, not to mention NRI Muslims and equal dose of Non Resident Pakistani are out for blood of Mr. Modi. Paid Media has not only Prosecuted Mr. Modi they have found him guilty and ready to hang him. Heck, Teesta Setalvad has and continues to make millions from going after Mr. Modi.

Fortunately, in India, you can prosecute Mr. Modi all day long but you will not able to convict him. Reason: He has not committed any crime.
 

Smita, Baroda
52/D-15
Apr 11, 2012
01:00 AM

 "I've been thinking since the last ten years that a person who needs to keep being given clean chits every now and then, has to be a very dirty person."

A person, who keeps getting clean chits continuously for 10 years in spite of repeated attempts to tarnish him, must be squeaky clean.

Ganesan, Nj
53/D-16
Apr 11, 2012
01:19 AM

>> I've been thinking since the last ten years that a person who needs to keep being given clean chits every now and then, has to be a very dirty person.

So what in the opinion of the person whom you hold in high esteem should we do? Declare him guilty and hang him?

Whats InAName
San Francisco, United States
54/D-17
Apr 11, 2012
01:22 AM

>> Pakistani judges probably studied in the same school Raghavan and Nanavati went to

You forgot to include your favorite whipping boy Atma Charan in that.

The Madrassa where all these "religious bigots" went to, should be identified.

Whats InAName
San Francisco, United States
55/D-18
Apr 11, 2012
01:31 AM

Smita,

Banerjee Commission was just a Railway Department Commission, which did find holes in "the conspiracy to set fire" theory. Nanavati commission unashamedly refuses to call Modi to testify! Foreign funded NGO's, paid media and Teesta's millions are all a figment of your imagination. I thank you however for not being rude to me like some others. That's Gujarati sadbhavana!

Anwaar, Dallas
56/D-19
Apr 11, 2012
01:31 AM

 "Pakistani judges probably studied in the same school Raghavan and Nanavati went to"

Can we know in advance where our Supreme Court justices went to school? 

Ganesan, Nj
57/D-20
Apr 11, 2012
03:34 AM

Teesta and company went to SC and asked to set up a SIT to investigate this point, this point and this point... The SC set up SIT and asked SIT to investigate on these very points given by Teesta and Co.  Now that SIT says no evidence on these points, people say that means all evidence out side of the given points SIT ignored !!  So the Clean Chit is no Clean Chit.  With these people Mr. Modi can't win for losing.

P.B. Joshipura, Suffolk, Virginia
58/D-21
Apr 11, 2012
05:03 AM

Had  a single joker raised the Question why not a single ruler in a Islamic Country has been prosecuted for crimes against humanity till date and hanged by its very own.No.

If that was what they got from there very own ,how can they expect things to be different elsewhere.

Yes its the Americans who got Saddam prosecuted and hanged for crimes against humanity.

The forum for debate has been reduced to one off absolute disregard to ethics which govern discussion in a civilized society..

Personel attacks and open flaunting of religious intolerance and hate has been the hall mark,here.

Not a single self confessed Patriots came on board to explain what CAG had made out in Gujrat regarding the 5k Crore loss to the state.

Anyway what the SIT has said and what the Victims have to say in this regard is none my business.

wrongone, chennai
59/D-22
Apr 11, 2012
05:11 AM

@ Wrong One

>> "Yes its the Americans who got Saddam prosecuted and hanged for crimes against humanity."

Which crimes? Nobody - till date - knows the whereabouts of the WMDs that the Americans went so crazy about. It is George Bush who should be prosecuted and hanged for the crimes against humanity.

>> "Not a single self confessed Patriots came on board to explain what CAG had made out in Gujrat regarding the 5k Crore loss to the state."

Those turned out to be business losses, a result of bad business decisions, not corruption. Even Congress is waving only the front cover, avoiding the details inside. 

The Irreverent Indian
Online, India
60/D-25
Apr 11, 2012
07:23 AM

 Saroja writes:

Someone I hold in high esteem said a very interesting thing to me:
"I've been thinking since the last ten years that a person who needs to keep being given clean chits every now and then, has to be a very dirty person."

By that logic, all witch hunts will be justified! 

Too bad, in advanced societies, it takes the burden of proof to hang someone.

Bruce Campbell for Prez, Amarillo
61/D-26
Apr 11, 2012
07:33 AM

There is classical legal theory boldly enunciated in Ode massacre case recently pronounced by brave lady Judge Hon'ble Poonam Singh, namely, the victims-9 women, 9 children and 5 men had nothing to do with the burning of Sabarmati Express S-6 coach or they have not played any role there, nor there was any threat to accused by them nor accused should fear them, hence, first time in the history of riots a clear cut case was made out by the prosecution under section 120-B of IPC. This classical angle is intentionally missing in SIT report. Or Dr. R.K. Raghvan bitterrly beaten by the mob after Rajiv Gandhi assassination as he was then his security officer has continued to suffer fron the poor vision ??? The irony is that Apex Court has asked the blind man to "look into " the matter and has brought disgrace to rule of law and truth and justice internationally.

A. Patrawala, Surat Gujarat
62/D-29
Apr 11, 2012
08:07 AM

>> Had a single joker raised the Question why not a single ruler in a Islamic Country has been prosecuted.

Irrelevant! (Hosni Mubarak is being prosecuted. Qadafi was killed by an enraged crowd. Zine  el Abidin fled the country, the Shah of Iran fled the country, King Farouk fled the country, and so on and so forth.)

Anwaar, Dallas
63/D-30
Apr 11, 2012
09:00 AM

 "Too bad, in advanced societies, it takes the burden of proof to hang someone."

We are a super duper advanced society of lotus eaters. As I said earlier, had Nuremberg trials been outsourced to India, Hitler would have got a clean chit( assuming that the trials would have ended by now). Absolutely to witch hunting.

Ofcourse  Germany would not then have been able to put its past behind after the cleansing produced by Nuremberg trials.

I am seething with pain and anger. Some prayer would be in order.

Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high
Where knowledge is free
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments
By narrow domestic walls
Where words come out from the depth of truth
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way
Into the dreary desert sand of dead habit
Where the mind is led forward by thee
Into ever-widening thought and action
Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.

R. Saroja
Bombay, India
64/D-31
Apr 11, 2012
09:02 AM

  "Too bad, in advanced societies, it takes the burden of proof to hang someone."

We are a super duper advanced society of lotus eaters. As I said earlier, had Nuremberg trials been outsourced to India, Hitler would have got a clean chit( assuming that the trials would have ended by now). Absolutely no witch hunting.

Ofcourse Germany would not then have been able to put its past behind after the cleansing produced by Nuremberg trials.

I am seething with pain and anger. Some prayer would be in order.

Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high
Where knowledge is free
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments
By narrow domestic walls
Where words come out from the depth of truth
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way
Into the dreary desert sand of dead habit
Where the mind is led forward by thee
Into ever-widening thought and action
Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.

R. Saroja
Bombay, India
65/D-32
Apr 11, 2012
09:32 AM

>>While we are extolling Raghavan and his SIT, let us not forget that during Raghavan's tenure as Director of the CBI (1999-2001) the CBI was under a cloud owing to its handling of the Priyadarshini Mattoo case, in which Santosh Kumar Singh,…..

And you thought scavengers of Gujarat riot victims couldn’t stoop any lower. These jihadis defend MMS as a man of integrity when the nation is looted right under his nose but if CBI botches up a case in2001, its director lacks integrity! The foot soldiers of the scavenging bunch forgot to mention the following about Raghavan:

“Embarrassed by the judgment, the-then CBI Director, R K Raghavan, requested two Special Directors, P C Sharma and Gopal Achari, to study the judgement. Subsequently the CBI appealed the verdict in Delhi High court in 2000, after which the High Court issued a bailable warrant against the accused.”

This alliance of fifth columnists never complained when Raghavan was appointed as head of SIT by the SC. The moment they realized their propaganda was likely to be exposed, they start digging into his past. What pathetic losers!
 

RSM, Delhi
66/D-33
Apr 11, 2012
09:36 AM

" The moment they realized their propaganda was likely to be exposed, they start digging into his past. What pathetic losers!"

Expect more dirt from these losers in coming days. 

Maha
NJ, United States
67/D-34
Apr 11, 2012
09:38 AM

For Sale : Recently imported photocopying machines. Buyers may queue up in front of the CJP office.

K.Suresh, Bangalore
68/D-35
Apr 11, 2012
09:44 AM

INSAAF NAHIN HUA...

Favourite line of seculars and NGOs whose bread and butter is battering of Modi..

pankaj hedaoo, Kuala Lumpur
69/D-37
Apr 11, 2012
09:56 AM

@IRREVERENT INDIAN - "The Indian government's evidences were so lousy that even the US had to ignore it."

Have you heard of match-fixing ?

K.Suresh, Bangalore